
There's a debate underway, in newsrooms, boardrooms, and classrooms about how to save journalism. That's right: save journalism. Here's why, according to a recent article in the New York Times:
The American Journalism Review estimates that 15 percent of the nation’s newspaper newsroom jobs were lost in 2008 as news consumers continued to gravitate to online sources and as traditional revenue streams dried up; so far this year, major newspapers in Denver and Seattle have folded altogether.At the same time, the shift from a print-based, scheduled world of media to a digital, on-demand world of options is changing how journalists do their jobs...At stake is a generation of reporters, and the continued role of journalists as the eyes, ears and questioners for the public."
The full article can be found at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/education/edlife/journ-t.html?_r=2
Journalism's future depends on those who can come up with a new business model to support journalism; it may depend less upon those who create content and more upon those who devise new ways of getting the audience to pay for that content, in other words, those with both journalism and entrepreneurial skills.
After reading the whole article, what's your take on this? (by the way, note that it contains a good number of quotes from Chris Callahan, the dean of ASU's Walter Cronkite School of Journalism, who some of you met last week when he was here as the leader of our accreditation site team).